Google

Go Back   Men's Health Information, Including Fitness, Nutrition, Weight Loss, Working Out & Sex > Physical & Mental Health > Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer Discussions regarding all signs, symptoms and personal experiences with prostate cancer.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-20-2008, 10:41 AM
Silver Contributor 100+ Posts
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 400
Blog Entries: 8
alanstalk is on a distinguished road
Default STAMPEDE Trial 36 week checkup

I have been on the UK NHS clinical STAMPEDE trial since December of last year, randomised with standard HT and Celecoxib (4 x 200Mg a day).

Due to the fantastic response of HT (PSA down from 136 to 1.0 in 9 weeks) I was given a good prognosis that they could keep me going for many years to come, at least until better treatments and drugs are available. The not so good news is that my PSA has gone up again from 0.4 to 0.6, doubled since April. Still extremely low but the trend is upwards (136, 1.0, 0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 0.4 - 0.6). Oncologist thinks it is probably a blip but I have heard that one before. Seems to me I am on that slippery slope !!

Oncol states that she will monitor the situation but the North East Thames London area protocol is not to do anything until the PSA reaches 20 (at which stage the cancer begins growing/spreading again). Will not add Casodex in until then as they like to keep it in reserve and dosent think it would help to start it earlier - quite the contary. From what I have read of other prostate cancer patients in the UK Casodex is added in a lot ealier than a PSA of 20 and don't understand why Oncologists and Urologists can have such widely differing views !


I have another blood test for my diabetes in a months time which I asked my nurse to add in PSA. Oncol strongly advises against it as no significant change will happen in a month. Don't think I can resist it though. 20 does seems though an incredibly high PSA level to wait before adding in Casadex, I can understand the reasoning behind keeping Casadex in reserve to a certain extent but would it not be better to know if it is not working at an eralier stage when other treatments such as chemo can be used on a lower PSA and reduced tumors?
Guests, Become a Member to remove this ad!
Sponsored Links
alanstalk is offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

Ad Management by RedTyger
Home    |     Health Forums    |     Health Library    |     About Us    |     Bookmark    |     Contact    |     Privacy    |     Webmaster
Copyright ? 2006 Mens-Health.com. All Rights Reserved.