Quote:
Originally Posted by funguyfff
Actually the disorder can be possible in both males and females...it doesn't make any difference whether you are born male or female...
And very important thing..never under estimate your self..
If one is facing the problem like some erectile dysfunction you need to get proper treatment for that..and the person that facing such problem should go for proper medical treatment..
|
Hi Im actually trying to understand this answer in relation to the above post . Ive seen problems with Uncircumcised males ..where later in life im talking about age 25 they have been circumised ..ive never heard or seen any problems whatsoever with male circumcision ..with either muslim or Jewish men ..in fact its actually more hygienic ..now that is a fact that impossible to argue with ..regardless of any religious issues here ...people must remember that the incidences or cases of cervical cancers or abnormal cell changes (which i myself have received treatment for stage 2 cervical cell changes and had a coloscoscopy plus a biopsy) on the cervix ..my cervix was washed with a solution of vinegar type solution (fairly painful0 the cells clearly showed up white on monitor ..i watched the whole proceedure ..i requested that was allowed to ...the cells were in two areas ..they were burnt using a heated wire , destroying those potentially cancerous cells art the same time a biposy was taken checking for cancer ...those proceedres have a risk of infection of the cervix PID which i have had which may or may not have been a result of biopsy or proceedure that they did ..
I have no doubt that unprotected sex with an uncircumsised male was the reason or cause of my cervical cell changes ...
If you do look at this information and further information on circumcision you will see there is a "germ" that occurs in ALL men and it is naturally occurring underneath the foreskin of the uncircumcised penis ..NO ammount of washing will remove that !! its whether the female reacts to that ..some dont some do ..but looking at the evidence ..particularly of Israel and its females there ar very low incidences of this ...cervical cancers ...because of course ..less promiscuity .but virgins can and do get cervical cell changes and it only takes ONE partner that could be the husband ..but that man may not be circumcised ...that is not to say cervical changes would not occur in those every female who has only ever had a sexual relationship with a circumcised male ..other contributary factors include diet and smoking and stress ...
If this is done correctly ..thats male circumcision ...by the right people there should not be any problems ..female circumcision is a barbaric practice and its sole use is to take away sexaul pleasure and degrade a woman ...in doing do its removing a part of the body needed to excrete urine ..many women they just die of horrible infection ..that would be PID and others they bleed to death ..why has this been mentioned ?
I do not see the relevence or connection with the above post ???
The uncircumcised penis or the circumcised penis ..you can have problems medical problems errors occur in both causing erection problems ...and any surgery male or female on gentials or indeed many routine investigations such as cystoscopy in female can cause nerve damage to urethra..clitoris leading to loss of sensation ..some of these investigations are ness part of life and people ways of life ...i dont think we should be concentrating on circumcised penis ..i was concieved to a father who is not circumcised ...but i do think there are the hygine issues and the obvious medical evidence that circumcised men cause less problems for women reagarding cervical cancers ..uncircumcised men ..using a condom can prevent those changes leading to cervical cancers ..in all males regular sti checks and safe sex should be practised .